Skip to content

Seagate IronWolf Pro vs Toshiba MG09 16TB

There's nothing clear-cut between them on paper, so buy whichever's cheaper on the day.

Compared on 10 specs from the makers' datasheets and Backblaze's failure data, and a group only gets a winner when the gap between the two is clear-cut.

Side by side

SpecSeagate IronWolf ProToshiba MG09
Reliability Only the Toshiba MG09 is in Backblaze's data
Backblaze failure rateLifetime, 95% interval in brackets No data 1.29% (0.47%–2.81%)
Warranty and workload Level
Warranty 5 years 5 years
Workload ratingReads and writes a year 550 TB/yr 550 TB/yr
Where it fits Level
Line NAS Pro Data-centre
Rated NAS bays Any number Not stated
Recording CMR CMR
Noise and speed Level
Spindle speedFaster reads quicker, slower is quieter 7,200 rpm 7,200 rpm
Noise on the datasheetIdle / seeking, the maker's figure 20 / 26 dB 20 dB idle
Power The Toshiba MG09 draws less at idle
Power at idleMaker's average 5 W 4.16 W (better)
Power in useMaker's average 7.6 W 8.35 W

The Backblaze figures are lifetime annualised failure rates (Source: Backblaze), and we only call reliability when the two 95% intervals don't overlap.